Dibrand vs. Outsourcing Tradicional
Why "software factory" models are no longer viable for tech startups seeking real speed and quality.
| Feature | Dibrand | Traditional Outsourcing |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Talent | Validated Seniors | Junior-heavy models |
| Communication | Direct with Engineers | Account Managers / Proxy layers |
| IP Ownership | Full Legal Transfer | Cláusulas ambiguas / Retención |
| Integration | Product Culture & Ownership | Ejecución por ticket (Ticket-based) |
| Tech Stack | Next.js, Node.js, AI Agents, Web3 | Stacks heredados (Legacy stacks) |
The difference is in Ownership
At Dibrand, we are not a black box that receives requirements and returns code. We work as your engineering arm, aligned with your business goals and accelerating the roadmap through specific solutions such as Staff Augmentation and MVP Development.
"Traditional outsourcing seeks to maximize billables; Dibrand seeks to maximize impact."